The Houston Verdict

Houston County's Illegal Organ Since 2002

Week of April 6 - 12, 2003


We interrupt our regularly scheduled satire to bring you the following important message.

In our continuing mission to edify our readers we give you our Law School topic of the month: SLAPP suits. 

The United States and Georgia constitutions grant every person the right to participate in government and civic affairs, speak freely on public issues, and petition government officials for redress of grievances. Yet, individuals and community groups are sometimes sued for exercising these constitutional rights. These suits are known as "SLAPPs," or "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation."

Generally, a "SLAPP" is a (1) civil complaint or counterclaim; (2) filed against individuals or organizations; (3) arising from their communications to government or speech on an issue of public interest or concern. SLAPPs are often brought by corporations, real estate developers, government officials and others against individuals and community groups who oppose them on issues of public concern. SLAPP filers frequently use lawsuits based on ordinary civil claims such as defamation, conspiracy, malicious prosecution, nuisance, interference with contract and/or economic advantage, as a means of transforming public debate into lawsuits.

Ultimately, most SLAPPs are not legally successful. Nevertheless, while most SLAPPs do not succeed in court, they may "succeed" in other ways. This is because defending a SLAPP, even when the legal defense is strong, usually requires a substantial investment of money, time, and resources. The resulting effect "chills" public participation in, and open debate on, important public issues. This chilling effect is not limited to the SLAPP defendants -- other people refrain from speaking out on issues of public concern because they fear being sued for what they say.

SLAPPs are just plain wrong.  Only a person with a complete lack of regard for the Constitution could ever think a SLAPP is appropriate.  Never forget, "We don’t need Big Brother to protect us." According to Thomas Jefferson, "In every country where man is free to think and to speak, differences of opinion will arise from difference of perception, and the imperfection of reason; but these differences when permitted, as in this happy country, to purify themselves by free discussion, are but as passing clouds overspreading our land transiently and leaving our horizon more bright and serene." --Thomas Jefferson to Benjamin Waring, 1801. Certainly no one reading these words would ever consider such a devious course of action as filing a SLAPP to suppress free speech.  Would they?

We now return to our regularly scheduled satire.

 

Home

Hit Counter

As you probably know, this site is a little thing we like to call satire, it is not the Houston Home Journal nor is it District Attorney Kelly Burke's site.  It is however dedicated to illustrating the surreal nature of life with King Kelly, DA of  Houston County.  If you need this footnote to tell you this, you either rode the short bus to school or you are Kelly Burke.    This site was created on a private computer in a private home, on a private internet connection, to a privately owned domain.

[Blue Ribbon Campaign icon]